As you
may know, at each convention the
delegates get a written
ballot where they vote on whether to "retain" each plank of the
Platform. A plank can be deleted by simple majority vote. In 2002 the
Women's Rights plank passed by only 53%. (Any changes to planks
come
later in the proceedings.)
There are a number of reasons people vote
against the plank
besides opposition to it. Some delegates vote down all the planks
because they want a new platform, some are tired of the debate, and
worst -- some pro-choice delegates don't bother to vote, even though
they want to retain the plank.
Imagine that the Libertarian Party removes the
women's rights
plank this year. What do you think the second biggest story
coming out
of the convention (after the Presidential nominee) will be --
LIBERTARIAN PARTY ABOLISHES WOMEN'S RIGHTS PLANK or LIBERTARIAN PARTY
COMES OUT AGAINST ABORTION. (We can be sure the press will misrepresent
it.)
Remember, the headline in the Seattle
Post as we went into the
1987 Seattle convention was LIBERTARIAN PARTY SPLIT ON ABORTION ISSUE
-- just because some of us were vocally against Ron Paul promoting the
anti-abortion issue.
***If you want to retain the Women's
Rights plank, PLEASE get to the Convention the first day of the
business meetings, get your ballot,
and vote!***
***If the plank IS removed no doubt
there will be much out cry
and protest from delegates, including those who arrive later in the
convention. We encourage all pro-choicers to bring a motion to the
floor at every opportunity to put the plank back in to the platform.
However, remember it takes a two-thirds vote to get the plank put BACK
in the platform. SO LET’S KEEP IT IN!!***.
REPORT ON
2004 LP CONVENTION AND THE ABORTION
ISSUE
It was
all good news at the 2004 Libertarian Party Convention on the abortion
issue. The Platform Committee rejected several moves to dilute
the plank. Like the rest of the platform, the plank was reformatted,
per the above. It is less than eloquent, but retains the same
wording as the original plank. The Women's Rights Plank was
retained by a 75% vote. And a circulated proposal to dilute the
plank from the floor was never moved by a delegate. We did have
to list to a prohibitionist rant from Presidential candidate Jeffrey
Diket. Will pro-choicers have to run our OWN candidate in 2008 to
get in equal time for such a rant? SIGH...